Charlotte, NC Bankruptcy Lawyer and Debt Settlement Legal Services

Archive for the ‘Personal and Business Credit’ Category

WARNING: The Latest Internet Scam is Credit Card Debt Termination.

Too good to be true because it is 100% False.
Consumers be warned- “credit card debt termination” scams are spreading like wildfire right now on the Internet. It usually goes by the name “Credit Card Termination or some variation on that name, and victims are paying thousands of dollars for this bogus service with the false belief that their debt will dissipate and their credit scored will not be damaged. By presenting a phony interpretation of banking and accounting laws, these con artists claim that they can legally terminate all of your credit card debt. They will go as far as hosting phony arbitrations and presenting victims with fake court documents.

This scheme has its roots in the income tax protest movement of the 1970s, where people were claiming that paying taxes was unconstitutional. Among professionals in the collection industry, the “Credit Card Termination” scam is called the “monetary protest movement.” The common theme with these programs is that our banking system prohibits banks from lending out their own money. So how does a credit card bank extend credit then? The protesters claim that the credit card agreement itself becomes a form of money the moment you sign it. Their premise is that the bank “deposits” your agreement as an asset on their books, and then any credit you use is offset as a liability against that asset. The scam promoters claim that all you need to do to wipe out your debt is demand your original “deposit” back from the bank, which will be offset against what you borrowed. THIS IS NOT TRUE or LEGITIMATE!! Just as the IRS shut down the tax protesters, the Attorney General’s Offices are actively prosecuting businesses and individuals for their participation in these fraudulent “debt termination” services.

Individuals in financial crisis may be tempted and lured in by the false promises and bogus testimonials advertised on the web pages of these, only to find themselves in worse trouble and greater debt. As I have advocated in other articles, investigate the credibility of any debt service providers you are considering. Are they licensed attorneys? Do they belong to the Better Business Bureau? Is there a physical office and address you can verify? Though you may feel stressed out, hopeless and think that things could not get any worse- trust me, get involved with one of these bogus “debt termination” scams and things will get a lot worse as your creditors, assuming that you have blithely ignored them, come after you.

As the Baby Boomer workforce faces retirement, personal debt will be a problem for many. Baby Boomers have earned the moniker “Sandwich Generation” as they are the first generation to face significant financial obligations for the previous generation as well as the future generation. Medical bills and assisted care for aging parents and skyrocketing education expenses are just a few examples of costs that will force a growing number of Baby Boomers to carry more debt into retirement. This debt will drain further an already underfunded retirement savings and force many Boomers to work longer or accept a lower standard of living.

The recession and weak economy have further hindered Baby Boomers in their quest to retire and enjoy the fruits of their lifetime of labor. 401K account balances have dwindled and have mockingly referred to as “201K’s”. On top of this, Social Security and Medicare will be going through many changes, which may further complicate future plans for Baby Boomers.

While most financial guides advocate the best way to prepare for retirement is to “save more money”, this advice is not particularly helpful or feasible for many Baby Boomers, given the financial realities they face. Neither are the traditional principles of curtailing spending or increasing earnings. 

* Save More – If they could, they would. Baby Boomers are the most driven and successful generation in terms of goal attainment and focus; patronizing, irrelevant advice such as this is both unhelpful as well as irritating.

* Spend Less – This works only on discretionary spending and is not particularly applicable to health insurance, medicine and medical care spending which is significant and ongoing for Baby Boomers caring for aging parents.
* Earn More – With soaring unemployment, organizational downsizing and cost cutting, it is more and more difficult for Baby Boomers to find paycheck which will cover their expenses and financial obligations AND fund retirement.

Most Baby Boomers ascribe to traditional values of honoring financial obligations and payments to their creditors, resulting in a highly stressful juggling act. Adding to the stress of the situation is the self imposed isolation; most Baby Boomers are ashamed to acknowledge, discuss or seek help with their debt.

If you are a Baby Boomer and have nodded in agreement while reading this article, let me ask for a few more moments of your time. There is nothing dishonorable about obtaining advice and assistance to manage financial hardship. If you are the sole supporter of your family, seeking help is the smart and responsible decision rather than suffering alone, letting the stress of the situation wear you down both physically and mentally. Recall airline safety demonstrations- place your own emergency oxygen mask on first before assisting your dependents.

“I feel like I can breathe again”, many of my clients say after learning about the debt relief options available to them. Legitimate debt relief providers, such as licensed attorneys and non-profit organizations, can give the information, guidance and planning individuals in financial crisis need to end the spiral of mounting debt and move towards financial wellness. Baby Boomers, make happiness the main ingredient in the generational “sandwich” of your lives.

More Americans filed for bankruptcy protection in March than during any month since the federal personal bankruptcy law was tightened in October 2005, a new report says, a result of high unemployment and the housing crash.

Federal courts reported over 158,000 bankruptcy filings in March, or 6,900 a day, a rise of 35 percent from February, according to a report to be released on Friday by Automated Access to Court Electronic Records, a data collection company known as Aacer. Filings were up 19 percent over March 2009. The previous record over the last five years was 133,000 in October.

“Even with the restrictive new law, we’re back up over where we were before the law changed,” Mike Bickford, president of Aacer, said in a phone interview Thursday from his headquarters in Oklahoma City. He faulted the stagnant economy, saying a surge in bankruptcies generally follows economic contraction by 6 to 18 months, and he pointed to March as a historically busy month for bankruptcy filings.

Other experts point out that filings invoking Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy code, a simple and inexpensive option, are rising faster than more complex Chapter 13 reorganization filings, under which consumers repay a portion of their debts so they can keep their homes, suggesting that more homeowners are simply walking away from underwater mortgages.

“Fewer people are trying to save their homes,” Katherine M. Porter, a University of Iowa law professor and bankruptcy expert, said in an interview by phone on Thursday. “They realize their payments are not affordable, and bankruptcy judges do not have the power to adjust the mortgages to make them more affordable.”

Statistics from the United States Trustee Program, the Justice Department office that oversees bankruptcy cases, show that Chapter 7 filings as a percentage of all bankruptcies have increased to about 73 percent in 2009 from about 62 percent in 2006-07. Of the 158,141 bankruptcy filings in March, 118,505, or 75 percent, were Chapter 7s and 38,241 were Chapter 13s, the Aacer report says.

“We think that means fewer and fewer families think they’re really going to save their homes,” Professor Porter said. “They don’t have any equity, so why try to keep up with their home payments?”

The nation’s high unemployment rate is one more reason for people to choose Chapter 7, Professor Porter said. “To file Chapter 13, you need ongoing income, and to the extent we have more people who are unemployed, they can’t use Chapter 13 because they don’t have that income to pay into the plan,” she said.

Finally, Professor Porter said, March is the high season for bankruptcy filings because many people in financial distress get a tax refund check that they can use to pay the $1,500 to $3,500 that a bankruptcy lawyer charges.

“People use their tax refunds to pay their attorney fees,” she said.

Doug Vaughan revealed thousands of dollars worth of cars and jewelry that were previously unknown Thursday at his personal bankruptcy hearing.

The disgraced realtor who investigators said is the mastermind of a massive “Ponzi scheme”, had to take tough questions from the people he’s accused of ripping off, but his answers were almost always the same.

Most of the investors coming out of the federal courthouse in downtown Albuquerque, Thursday afternoon, were not happy.

“He’s answering one or two insignificant questions but basically he’s invoking the fifth”, Investor Phil Dougan said.

Vaughan did that on the advice of his lawyers, whom he turned to repeatedly as some of his 600 investors and their lawyers grilled him.

“It doesn’t make it any better when you come in with your own attitude, but I think he is getting bad advice now, I don’t think he would do this if he was on his own I think he would answer it,” Dougan said.

Attorney for several investors, William Davis, said the investors felt betrayed.

“You trusted him and made investments with him and now it turns out that the friend has been misusing your money, at least that’s the allegation,” Davis said.

When the real estate mogul did answer questions, he had some surprises for the court.

“He identified a number of assets today. $100,000 worth of jewelry, a corvette, and there are other assets that we are going to try and recover for the creditors.” Davis said.

Vaughan said he also has a Harley and a Ferrari, which he’s looking to sell. He said he will keep his Jaguar, since it’s his only transportation.

He told the crowd that he hasn’t made payments on his massive, multimillion dollar home in the heights since filing for bankruptcy in February.

Vaughan says he has only taken in $3,000 as income since the filing, but did reveal that he has spent some time recently traveling to Las Vegas.

“He said the tickets were a gift from a friend he had conveyed some assets to he had said,” Davis said.

That friend that Vaughan says gave him the $1,500 trip as a Christmas gift, is the same friend Vaughan gave a car and home to.

It was also reveled in court Thursday that Vaughan lost $31,000 gambling in Vegas last year.

Vaughan’s real estate company also filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and had a separate bankruptcy hearing Thursday morning. Vaughan did not show up for that. An executive from the company did and he answered questions.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday made it easier for people who say they cannot repay their student loans to receive bankruptcy protection. But the case arose in an unusual way, and the ruling is unlikely to have a broad impact.

Related

Times Topics: U.S. Supreme Court | Student LoansThe case involved Francisco J. Espinosa, an airline ramp agent who took out four student loans in 1988 and 1989 for a total of $13,250 to attend a trade school in Arizona. Four years later, he filed for protection under the bankruptcy laws, proposing to repay the principal over five years without interest.

Neither Mr. Espinosa nor the judge who approved his proposal followed the procedures contemplated by the law. Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code allows student loans like Mr. Espinosa’s to be discharged only if a bankruptcy judge finds that repayment would impose an “undue hardship.” But the judge in his case made no such finding.

Nor did Mr. Espinosa notify his lender in the way required by law, which calls for the service of a summons and complaint like those in a civil lawsuit.

But the lender did receive notices from the court about Mr. Espinosa’s proposal and the court’s approval of it. Although the loan was the only debt Mr. Espinosa listed in his proposal, the lender did not object or appeal.

Mr. Espinosa finished paying the principal back in 1997, and the bankruptcy court then discharged the interest he would have owed. Years later, the lender tried to re-open the case.

The Supreme Court’s decision on Tuesday rejected positions advanced by the federal government, more than 30 states and the student loan industry. The lender in Mr. Espinosa’s case, United Student Aid Funds, warned in a brief that a decision in his favor would “open the floodgates” to allowing others to avoid paying their debts, including “taxes, domestic support obligations, drunk driving personal injury and death liabilities, and criminal fines and restitution.”

But the court, in a unanimous decision by Justice Clarence Thomas, resolved the case on a narrow ground. It was undisputed, Justice Thomas wrote, that there had been legal misfires along the way in Mr. Espinosa’s case. The issue before the court, he said, was whether the lender had waited too long to object to them.

“The bankruptcy court’s failure to find undue hardship before confirming Espinosa’s plan was a legal error,” Justice Thomas wrote in the case, United Student Aid Funds v. Espinosa, No. 08-1134. “But the order remains enforceable and binding on United because United had notice of the error and failed to object or timely appeal.”

The rules allowing cases to be re-opened in extraordinary circumstances did not apply here, Justice Thomas wrote, as they do not “provide a license for litigants to sleep on their rights.”